EVE Search - Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1429	Posted - 2015.01.12 12:26:25 - [1] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Gabriel Elarik wrote: the point is the cloaker is in Hostile space and 100% safe nothing should be 100% safe while ingame I demand everyone AFK in a station should be forced to undock so I can kill them. Quoted for truth. Also, I read the frist page of posts. Nothing has changed. -.- The ideas are all "special ship" "Special Probes" "make cloak use capacitor".... sigh Sorry, I just can't read this thread anymore, I feel like it sucks the life out of me and by the time I'd get to the "decloaking Ammo" part I'd be dead. Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Also This --> AFK Cloaking Collection Thread Please stop making "fix afk cloaking!" threads, your idea is not new. Thanks in advance.
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1438	Posted - 2015.01.13 13:54:01 - [2] - Quote Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Howabout make it so people in local who haven't entered any commands for 5 minutes are greyed out and listed as AFK? It won't resolve the potentiality of them being in a stealth bomber or force recon, but it will give some insight as to their activity level. But Reaver, how will you know if the person is really afk and not just faking? Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Fighting back is more fun than not. Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1467	Posted - 2015.02.05 14:33:09 - [3] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: baltec1 wrote: Dracvlad wrote: CCP needs to look at the mechanisms to deal with people who are not actually playing the game using their logged in character to stop other people from playing the game. You can put words in my mouth all you want, but my suggestion is the best way to deal with the AFK cloaky camping issue which drives players away from Eve. Please provide any evidence that shows people have quit EVE because there is a cloaked ship in local with nobody at the controls. Please show evidence to prove that this is not the case... Doesn't eve still have like 250k unique accounts? Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Fighting back is more fun than not. Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1468	Posted - 2015.02.05 14:42:47 - [4] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: Irrelevant... And how do you know they are unique accounts, prove that! No need to. CCP sayd it's 250k active unique accounts some time ago, if that's not enough for you, nothing will be. Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Fighting back is more fun than not. Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1468	Posted - 2015.02.05 15:13:54 - [5] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: Debora Tsung wrote: Dracvlad wrote: Irrelevant... And how do you know they are unique accounts, prove that! No need to. CCP sayd it's 250k active unique accounts some time ago, if that's not enough for you, nothing will be. Link it then, I can hardly take your word for it. Also another issue is how do they define unique account, is it IP related or user name, as if I could not give a false name or mask my IP all the time, but anyway, its still irrelevant... But they have not released data showing why people stopped playing have they! well. lets see: IGN News Rockpapershotgun wikipedia Since I'm currently at the office, I don't have time to do more than a shallow google search, but I am sure I'll be able to find some more results. There's simply not wnough people that even suffer enough from afk cloaking enough to leave to make an impact... Now that I've said it, suffering from afk cloaking sounds like "Ma'am you've contracted a very severe case of NOTHING! We need to operate, IMMEDIATELY!" Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Fighting back is more fun than not. Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1468	Posted - 2015.02.05 15:23:29 - [6] - Quote Haywoud Jablomi wrote: Went to deal with an SBU. In system were a couple cloakies just hanging out. Not a big deal, we could deal with them on their own if needed. So we engage on the SBU and get it to about 40 % shields when the on grid sabre decloaks and warps off. This entire time the sabre had been watching us, gaining intel and advising his fleet on what to bring. That is the whole purpose of cloaking devices. Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Fighting back is more fun than not. Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1470	Posted - 2015.02.05 16:06:52 - [7] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: he was not able to operate in 0.0 due to excessive AFK camping... And that here is the whole problem of the "OMGHALP!afkcloakrz r UBER!" Crowd... Or maybe it's herd, dunno. The only possibility somebody could stop you from playing while being afk is that A) he's standing right behind you, with a gun B) he's got some secret mind control ray... which has to be monitored always, so he can't play eve while it's on. The only thing stopping you from playing while some afk dude is in your system is you. Or more spcifically your fear. And I really can't understand why you let your fear influence your actions, this is a game, nobody can hurt you from inside that game especially not if he's afk. EDIT: Even if I wouldn't support that, I suppose there have been worse ideas than an afk flag... Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Fighting back is more fun than not. Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1471	Posted - 2015.02.05 22:05:30 - [8] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: Debora Tsung wrote: Dracvlad wrote: he was not able to operate in 0.0 due to excessive AFK camping... And that here is the whole problem of the "OMGHALP!afkcloakrz r UBER!" Crowd... Or maybe it's herd, dunno. The only possibility somebody could stop you from playing while being afk is that A) he's standing right behind you, with a gun B) he's got some secret mind control ray... which has to be monitored always, so he can't play eve while it's on. The only thing stopping you from playing while some afk dude is in your system is you. Or more spcifically your fear. And I really can't understand why you let your fear influence your actions, this is a game, nobody can hurt you from inside that game especially not if he's afk. EDIT: Even if I wouldn't support that, I suppose there have been worse ideas than an afk flag... Risk, not fear, sigh... No. Not Risk. Fear! You're afraid of risk and that's why you choose to not take any. And that is your problem and yours alone, nobody and nothing else can be at fault for that. Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Fighting back is more fun than not. Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1471	Posted - 2015.02.05 22:31:28 - [9] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: Yeah yeah yeah, strong words from a renter and I just looked at your killboard, oh dear... Down to insults so soon? Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Fighting back is more fun than not. Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1471	Posted - 2015.02.05 22:45:15 - [10] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: I am just stating facts you are a renter and your killboard would not get you into NCDOT. for example, thats a fact Would be nice if it were true., no. I just stated the obvious. EVE is a game, there is no risk involved, if it was even just remotely fun, it was worth it. I simply cannot understand how you can be cowed into sitting around doing nothing for hours on end because of some random dude that might or might not actually be there. Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Fighting back is more fun than not. Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1472	Posted - 2015.02.05 22:52:04 - [11] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: Blimey for Eve players you are remarkably thin skinned, why would I want any credit from you, I put forward an idea to have an AFK flag after an hour of not playing, this would be removed by any use of D-scan, warping or using a module, an create a notification feed. I already said there were worse ideas than an AFK flag, but what would that really change? As an intel gatherer I don't exacctly need to use dscan. I can just sit cloaked at a nice cozy ping and just post anything I see on my usual intel channels. There, still flagged as afk, still get intel and nothing has changed. Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Fighting back is more fun than not. Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.
Debora Tsung Die Woge des Wahnsinns Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 1472	Posted - 2015.02.05 22:53:37 - [12] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: Debora Tsung wrote: Dracvlad wrote: you started it. Would be nice if it were true., no. I just stated the obvious. EVE is a game, there is no risk involved, if it was even just remotely fun, it was worth it. I simply cannot understand how you can be cowed into sitting around doing nothing for hours on end because of some random dude that might or might not actually be there. EDIT: also, you're not the only one who can edit his posts. Because I did not sit around cowed, there you go again! So I guess cloaking is fine then, since there is nothing you actually seem to complain about, no? Stupidity should be a bannable offense. Fighting back is more fun than not. Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.